Publications internationales

France:

• Sainteny, G. (2011). Rapport - Les aides publiques dommageables à la biodiversité. Centre d’analyse stratégique. Paris
• Budget vert France (2021). Rapport sur l’impact environnemental du budget de l’État. Commissariat général au développement durable (CGDD) du ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire, la direction du budget (DB), la direction de la législation fiscale (DLF), la direction générale du Trésor (DGT). Paris

Italie:

• Directorate General for Sustainable Development, EU and International Affairs (DG-SVI) (2021). Catalogo dei sussidi ambientalmente dannosi e dei sussidi ambientalmente favorevoli 2020.
• Directorate General for Sustainable Development, EU and International Affairs DG-SVI. (2018). Catalogo dei sussidi ambientalmente dannosi e dei sussidi ambientalmente favorevoli 2017. (U.A.T. Sogesid. Articolo 68 della legge 28 dicembre 2015, N. 221, S. 514)
• Directorate General for Sustainable Development, EU and International Affairs (DG-SVI) (2016): Italian Catalogue of Environmentally Friendly Subsidies and Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Länderebene: Trentino: Catalogo Provinciale dei sussidi. 2020

Allemagne:

• Beermann, A.-C. et al. (2020). Studie: Zehn klimaschädliche Subventionen im Fokus. Hrsg. Forum ökologisch-soziale Marktwirtschaft im Auftrag von Greenpeace. Berlin.
• Bundesamt für Naturschutz (2019). Abbau naturschädigender Subventionen und Kompensationszahlungen auf stoffliche Belastungen. ([16.04.2022]).
• Umweltbundesamt (2021). Umweltschädliche Subventionen in Deutschland. Berlin. ([16.04.2022]).
• Umweltbundesamt (2016). Umweltschädliche Subventionen in Deutschland (Aktualisierte Ausgabe 2016). Berlin.

• Bundesfinanzministerium BFM (2019). Subventionsbericht des Bundes inkl. Nachhaltigkeitsprüfung der Subventionen. Berlin.

• Zerzawy, F. et al. (2021). Umweltschädliche Subventionen in Deutschland: Fokus Biodiversität. Forum ökologisch-soziale Marktwirtschaft. Berlin.

Autriche:

• Umweltdachverband. (2014). Abbau umweltschädlicher Subventionen in Österreich. Update 2014. Ein Beitrag zur Ökologisierung des Steuersystems. Wien.

International:

• Koplow, D., Steenblik, R.  (2022). Protecting Nature by Reforming Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: The Role of Business. businessfornature. Camebridge. ([22.04.2022])

OCDE:

• OECD (1998). Improving the Environment Through Reducing Subsidies (Part I Summary and Policy Conclusions, S. 127). Paris. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (2000). Improving the Environment through Reducing Subsidies (Part III: Case Studies. OECD, S. 272) Paris. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (2003). Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. Policy Issues And Challenges. Paris. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (2005). Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Challenges for Reform. S. 159. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (2007). Subsidy Reform and Sustainable Development: Political economy aspects. Paris. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (2019). Finance and the Economic and Business Case for Action. S. 72. ([11.04.2020])
• OECD (2020). A Comprehensive Overview of Global Biodiversity Finance (Nr. 17. S. 13). ([11.04.2020])

Union européenne:

• European Commission (2021): Mapping Objectives in the Field of Environmental Taxation and Budgetary Reform: Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Oosterhuis, F. (2001). Energy subsidies in the European Union. Final report. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM).
• Valsecchi, C., ten Brink, P., Bassi, S., Withana, S., Lewis, M., Best, A., Oosterhuis, F., Dias Soares, C., Rogers-Ganter, H. & Kaphengst, T. (2009). Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Identifica-tion and Assessment, Final report. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).
• Withana, S., ten Brink, P., Franckx, L., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Mayeres, I., Oosterhuis, F., and Porsch, L. (2012). Study supporting the phasing out of environmentally harmful subsidies. A report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit (IVM), Ecologic Institute and VITO for the European Commission – DG Environment. Final Report. Brussels. 2012.

G20 Fossil Fuel Subsidies Peer-Reviews:

• Members of the-Peer Review Team (2019): Italy’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer-Review Team (2019): Indonesia’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• OECD/IEA (2020): The Netherlands’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer Review Team (2017): Mexico’s Efforts to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer Review Team (2017): Germany’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer Review Team (2016): China’s Efforts to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer Review Team (2016): United States’ Efforts to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).

APEC FFS Peer Reviews:

• APEC Energy Working Group (2015): Peer Review on Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms in New Zealand. ([16.04.2022]).
• APEC Energy Working Group (2017): Peer Review on Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms in Chinese Taipei. ([16.04.2022]).