Publikationen International ¶

Frankreich:

• Budget vert France (2021). Rapport sur l’impact environnemental du budget de l’État. Commissariat général au développement durable (CGDD) du ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire, la direction du budget (DB), la direction de la législation fiscale (DLF), la direction générale du Trésor (DGT). Paris
• Sainteny, G. (2011). Rapport - Les aides publiques dommageables à la biodiversité. Centre d’analyse stratégique. Paris

Italien:

• Directorate General for Sustainable Development, EU and International Affairs (DG-SVI) (2021). Catalogo dei sussidi ambientalmente dannosi e dei sussidi ambientalmente favorevoli 2020.
• Länderebene: Trentino: Catalogo Provinciale dei sussidi. 2020
• Directorate General for Sustainable Development, EU and International Affairs DG-SVI. (2018). Catalogo dei sussidi ambientalmente dannosi e dei sussidi ambientalmente favorevoli 2017. (U.A.T. Sogesid. Articolo 68 della legge 28 dicembre 2015, N. 221, S. 514)
• Directorate General for Sustainable Development, EU and International Affairs (DG-SVI) (2016): Italian Catalogue of Environmentally Friendly Subsidies and Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).

Deutschland:

• Forum Ökologisch-Soziale Marktwirtschaft (2025). Die versteckten Kosten der Ernährung Was kostet uns unsere Ernährung – für Gesundheit und Umwelt? Im Auftrag von Greenpeace. Berlin.
• Umweltbundesamt (2021). Umweltschädliche Subventionen in Deutschland. Berlin. ([16.04.2022]).
• Zerzawy, F. et al. (2021). Umweltschädliche Subventionen in Deutschland: Fokus Biodiversität. Forum ökologisch-soziale Marktwirtschaft. Berlin.
• Beermann, A.-C. et al. (2020). Studie: Zehn klimaschädliche Subventionen im Fokus. Hrsg. Forum ökologisch-soziale Marktwirtschaft im Auftrag von Greenpeace. Berlin.
• Bundesamt für Naturschutz (2019). Abbau naturschädigender Subventionen und Kompensationszahlungen auf stoffliche Belastungen. ([16.04.2022]).
• Bundesfinanzministerium BFM (2019). Subventionsbericht des Bundes inkl. Nachhaltigkeitsprüfung der Subventionen. Berlin.
• Umweltbundesamt (2016). Umweltschädliche Subventionen in Deutschland (Aktualisierte Ausgabe 2016). Berlin.

Österreich:

• Umweltdachverband. (2014). Abbau umweltschädlicher Subventionen in Österreich. Update 2014. Ein Beitrag zur Ökologisierung des Steuersystems. Wien.

International:

• Reyes-García, V., Villasante, S., Benessaiah, K., Pandit, R., Agrawal, A., Claudet, J., Garibaldi, L.A., Kabisa, M., Pereira, L., Zinngrebe, Y. (2025). The costs of subsidies and externalities of economic activities driving nature decline. Ambio 54: 1128–1141.
• Damania, R., Balseca, E., de Fontaubert, C., Gill, J., Kim, K., Rentschler, J., Russ, J., Zaveri, E. (2023). Detox Development. Repurposing Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. Washington, World Bank Group.
• Koplow, D., Steenblik, R. (2022). Protecting Nature by Reforming Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: The Role of Business. businessfornature. Camebridge. ([22.04.2022])

OECD:

• OECD (2022). Identifying and assessing subsidies and other incentives harmful to biodiversity. A comparative review of existing national-level assessments and insights for good practice. Working Paper
• OECD (2020). A Comprehensive Overview of Global Biodiversity Finance (Nr. 17. S. 13). ([11.04.2020])
• OECD (2019). Finance and the Economic and Business Case for Action. S. 72. ([11.04.2020])
• OECD (2007). Subsidy Reform and Sustainable Development: Political economy aspects. Paris. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (2005). Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Challenges for Reform. S. 159. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (2003). Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. Policy Issues And Challenges. Paris. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (2000). Improving the Environment through Reducing Subsidies (Part III: Case Studies. OECD, S. 272) Paris. ([22.04.2022])
• OECD (1998). Improving the Environment Through Reducing Subsidies (Part I Summary and Policy Conclusions, S. 127). Paris. ([22.04.2022])

European Union:

• European Commission (2024): Guidance document for reporting of non-energy Environmentally Harmful Subsidies (EHS)
• European Commission (2021): Mapping Objectives in the Field of Environmental Taxation and Budgetary Reform: Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Withana, S., ten Brink, P., Franckx, L., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Mayeres, I., Oosterhuis, F., and Porsch, L. (2012). Study supporting the phasing out of environmentally harmful subsidies. A report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit (IVM), Ecologic Institute and VITO for the European Commission – DG Environment. Final Report. Brussels. 2012.
• Usubiaga, A. et al. (2011), “EU Subsidies for Polluting and Unsustainable Practices”, Directorate General for Internal Policies Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.
• Valsecchi, C., ten Brink, P., Bassi, S., Withana, S., Lewis, M., Best, A., Oosterhuis, F., Dias Soares, C., Rogers-Ganter, H. & Kaphengst, T. (2009). Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Identifica-tion and Assessment, Final report. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).
• Oosterhuis, F. (2001). Energy subsidies in the European Union. Final report. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM).

UNDP

• UNDP (2024). The Nature of Subsidies, A step-by-step guide to repurpose subsidies harmful to biodiversity and improve their impact on people and nature. New York.
• Damania, R., Balseca, E., de Fontaubert, C., Gill, J., Kim, K., Rentschler, J., Russ, J., Zaveri, E. (2023). Detox Development. Repurposing Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. Washington, World Bank Group.

G20 Fossil Fuel Subsidies Peer-Reviews:

• Members of the-Peer Review Team (2019): Italy’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer-Review Team (2019): Indonesia’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• OECD/IEA (2020): The Netherlands’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer Review Team (2017): Mexico’s Efforts to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer Review Team (2017): Germany’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer Review Team (2016): China’s Efforts to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).
• Members of the Peer Review Team (2016): United States’ Efforts to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. ([16.04.2022]).

APEC FFS Peer Reviews:

• APEC Energy Working Group (2017): Peer Review on Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms in Chinese Taipei. ([16.04.2022]).
• APEC Energy Working Group (2015): Peer Review on Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms in New Zealand. ([16.04.2022]).